by Dr. Greg » Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:44 am
Before I address your specific questions, it is far more important, I think, that I first address the apparent mindset with which you are approaching this current conflict with your employer.
You are seeking to establish what is "normal," "standard," "common," or "a matter of law" in order to have some leverage with your employer. This approach is rarely effective in China.
You will notice that we have virtually no copies of full text legal documents on this site. That is because we know that these documents do NOT adequately inform what foreign experts can expect in China. They look impressive and they are usually dumped indiscriminately on websites to give the site an air of authority but, in reality, they are virtually useless (except, perhaps, for building resentment and anger). The link you embedded is to a website written by anonymous authors (which is why we removed it) and the interpretation that precedes paragraph 7 is approximately eight years old.
Years ago, university contracts used to be set at one year (12 months). Then again, the typical workload also used to be 12 to 14 periods. About four to five years ago, universities, in order to save money, started issuing 10-month contracts, meaning foreign teachers were on contract for 10 months and were paid a salary for 10 months.
As I indicated in my first reply, these terms are negotiable. That is, if the university wants you badly enough, you can negotiate a 12-month contract and salary.
The duration of one's residency permit is yoked to the contract. That is, if you are under contract for 10 months, then typically the duration of your residency permit is usually 10 to 11 months. In some provinces, it is becoming common practice for the FAOs to apply for 11-month residency permits on 12-month contracts because they can save a lot of money.
Instead of trying to establish "what should be," why don't we deal with what is? Specifically, what does your contract addendum say about vacation pay for February?
Again, the answers to your questions are in your contract addendum: not in what should be, what is common, what we as Westerners think is normal, or—least of all—what the SAFEA advises or the letter of the law stipulates.
PS. Based on the fact that you didn't make any specific references to your contract addendum, I am assuming that you were cheated this time around. My best advice is this: Instead of making yourself sick over what should be or what is true for others, use this as a learning experience to find a much better paying job, one where you will be valued and treated fairly and with respect.
Remember, you need both a letter of release and recommendation from these people in order to move on.