by Dr. Greg » Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:44 pm
Personally, I avoid the discussion of politics as much as possible and that's relatively easy for me to do because the subject doesn't naturally present itself when you're teaching medical psychology, statistics, and medical ethics. Aside from that, I am not a very political person to begin with.
No matter how neutral or well-balanced you may in fact be, that doesn't mean the students will necessarily hear it that way: You can easily be misinterpreted and misquoted and, in part, the language barrier will contribute to that likelihood.
China is a very narcissistically-damaged culture and has zero tolerance for any criticism of any kind unless it is first prefaced with rampant praise and several leading qualifications (excuses)—and even then it is very risky business.
All webmasters of China-related websites know that there are two topics, in particular, that the censors have zero tolerance for: Mention them or allow your readers to mention them and your site will only be available in China via a proxy server or virtual private network in a matter of days. It's that simple.
Before I published the original version of our Guide, I asked two Chinese colleagues to read it not just for accuracy but as a government official would: I was strongly advised to rewrite a few sections so that they would be "less objectionable" (and I did). I didn't delete anything I felt was important but I was obliged to find an alternative way of presenting the same information—obliged, that is, if I wanted the Guide to remain available to readers from within China.
I'll ask Ken to weigh in on this subject and if any of our regular posters want to share any personal experiences with this issue, I'll publish them with the understanding that we won't be delving into any specific political topics on this forum.